IT WAS A MAN’S WORLD UNTIL HILLARY CLINTON ENTERED THE BOY’S ROOM

AND TOOK IT LIKE A LITTLE GIRL

BY LISA RICHARDS

NOVEMBER 13, 2007

For decades radical feminists have insisted on being treated equal to men. They have endorsed genderless equality while demanding men treat them no different than men. Yet the moment the equality is bestowed in an all man’s setting, the feministas turn into little girls, stamping their feet and demanding the men stop being mean to them and treat them with the same respect they would treat real ladies.

Hillary Clinton has become one of those cry-babies who insist on using the men’s room, demands to be treated like a man, but crumples into a little girl as soon as men point out she is still a woman and they are going to treat her as such by criticizing what they feel is not strong enough leadership to join the boy’s club.

Ouch.

The October 30, 2007 Democrat Debate was a perfect example of a radical feminist being knocked off her genderless pedestal by men she thought she could become. Rather than treat Senator Clinton like a lady, they treated her like the man she desires to be: the democrat candidates hit her hard with the same comments they would throw at each other and Hillary Clinton couldn’t handle it.

Someone should have told Hillary Clinton the only female democrat candidate is John Edwards. Even he knows it’s a man’s world and has no problem being treated like a lady.

Hillary Clinton’s problem is she, like all radical feminists, think they can be men and want to be men in a man’s world. Yet when the men of the world treat them equally, radicalistas revert back to daddy’s little girl insisting the boys stop picking on them or they’ll tell their father.

During the debate, Madame Romanov’s failures as a Senator and First Lady were pointed out in detail and she could not handle the truth, complaining later that moderator Tim Russert was too tough on her.

When asked about Governor Elliot Spitzer’s insane plan to grant illegal aliens New York State driver’s licenses, which would allow the criminals to vote in the 2008 election, Hillary Clinton refused to give a yes or no answer as to whether she supported Spitzer’s plan or not.  The lack of answer spoke volumes: Clinton will support any means to get the democrat vote, even if it is obtained criminally.

After the debate in which Hillary was trounced on like she does to all in her way, the Senator claimed the thrashing of her record was “the politics of pile-on” by her opponents.

Rather than take the trouncing like the man she is, Hillary ran crying to her genderless Wellesley girls telling them politics is an evil world called the “all boy’s club” Wellesley “prepared” her to join. That would explain the fact Wellesley turns out so many gym teachers.  That also explains why there are no women to be found in politics to this day.

In fact, I have it on good authority that Condoleezza Rice is actually J.C. Watts in drag. That is the reason Congressman Watts left office at the precise moment Condi got her job: Washington wanted to appear women-friendly by having a female head the State Department. Washington tried with Dick Armatige as Madeline Albright, but everyone including Kim Jung IL saw through that disguise.

But Hillary is not giving up on her hopeless attempt to become first female president. Like all failures who can’t make it in a man’s world, Hillary is prepared for her town hall question and answer speeches with prepared-for-the-audience planted questions written by her staff so Hillary can never be caught off guard with questions the scripted politician can’t answer.

No wonder Russert caught Hillary off guard, he didn’t take the baited script Hillary passes out to all who ask her questions.

Can America just envision a Hillary presidency? The entire eight years would be scripted with Helen Thomas and Helen Thomas only asking Hillary the questions at the press conferences. Thus the explanation of why Hillary Clinton has never spoken to Bill O’Reilly or Sean Hannity—they don’t use a script prepared by the interviewee. CNN is glad to whore itself for Hillary’s prepared-in-advance answers.

Hillary Clinton can kiss the presidency goodbye. The presidential boy’s club will remain so until the United States produces it’s very own Margaret Thatcher. And Hillary Clinton is not, nor will she ever be the Iron Lady or any lady.

Note to Hillary Clinton: it will always be a man’s world because God created Adam, a man, first. You will never turn men into women—except John Edwards—so give it up. Radical feminists need to realize they lost their battle long ago and made themselves look like fools. Now men look at them as men and see radical feminists as the joke they are—women trying to grow something between their legs that hangs as bad as their bra-less appendages not even a blind man wants to see.

copyright Lisa Richards 2007

www.lisa-richards.com

E-mail: lisa-richards@lisa-richards.com

CLOSE ENCOUNTERS OF THE HOBBIT KIND

THE IDIOT OF THE WEEK: DENNIS KUCINICH

BY LISA RICHARDS

November 9, 2007

I’ve pretty much come to expect anything to slip out of the mouth of presidential candidates nowadays. They name-call, they caterwaul like spoiled brats, they regale us with tales of their mill workin’ daddies, struggling moms (I’m waiting to hear how they walked twenty miles to school without shoes), gave a hamster mouth-to-mouth resuscitation, got a splinter in the a** in Vietnam in order to become a decorated war hero, met a poor person with one leg, one arm and no teeth because Republicans refuse to let poor people live like humans, and have had to struggle distressfully in an all boys political club. The nauseating list goes on and on to the point one wonders when the mother ship will land and take them all back from whence they came.

And then it does; right in the middle of the Democrat Presidential Debate.

It doesn’t take a rocket scientist to realize Dennis Kucinich is not a normal man. Let’s face it; the man is a Hobbit, which would undoubtedly make Hillary Clinton Sauron. But nonetheless, the man is definitely something from a Tolkien fairy tale. And he apparently lives in a fairy tale world, because Martians have appeared to Dennis Kucinich. 

That’s right; Presidential Candidate Congressman Dennis Kucinich told an audience at a recent Presidential Debate that he has seen UFO’s. Kucinich stated: “It was an unidentified flying object…and I'm also going to move my campaign office to Roswell, New Mexico…and also, you have to keep in mind that Jimmy Carter saw a UFO.”

Oh that really validates the claim with authoritative normality: the anti-American commie-loving Carter sees Martians. Maybe after a couple jars of homemade hooch.

The most authentic source of proof Kucinich has to back his Star Trek claims is none other than the many-lives-lived actress Shirley MacClain. That’s right; Miss MacClain stated Kucinich “saw a gigantic triangular craft, silent and observing him. It hovered for about ten minutes or so and sped away with a speed he [Kucinich] couldn’t comprehend.”

Oh please! Triangular, hovers low, is very silent, flies at very high speed…

Comprehend this you crossed-over imbecile and elfin geek: Stealth Bomber!

This is what’s in charge of the state of Ohio’s lives: a man who believes in Martians. And he’s no Bill Bixby ladies.

No one should be shocked over Kucinich’s close encounters of the loose canon kind. What can one expect from a man who placed an ad in newspapers looking to find a woman for his last presidential run? Shirley’s single, she sees dead people and Kucinich sees UFO’s. It’s a perfect match.

What is crazier is Kucinich is serious. He believes he saw a UFO. He never took into account the military has fighter planes resembling things he so obviously watches and believes on the Sci/Fi channel. Apparently he is vying for the Sci/Fi Convention vote. That would be men his age who live in their mother’s basements with a wardrobe of William Shatner uniforms.

When a college educated democrat makes Ozzy Osborne look clear-headed, it’s time for democrats to shut down their party and come to the realization that it’s over; Rudy’s going to kick their butts back to Mordor.

copyright 2007 Lisa Richards

www.lisa-richards.com

lisa-richards@lisa-richards.com

REMEMBER THE ALAMO:

BECAUSE WASHINGTON HAS FORGOTTEN

BY LISA RICHARDS

OCTOBER 30, 2007

Mexico has officially invaded the U.S. on a political scale. The Mexican Army has crossed U.S. borders with machine guns they use to fire at U.S. Border Guards attempting to prevent illegal aliens and drug smugglers from entering U.S. borders. Worse; the Mexican Army aids and protects illegals, drug smugglers, and human traffickers crossing the borders, and Washington knows.

This violation of Mexico upon the U.S. is an all out military invasion with enough evidence for the Bush  Administration and Washington to call up the National Guard, place them on the borders with orders to shoot to kill every Mexican uniform, drug and human trafficker U.S. troops find invading. There is enough evidence for the U.S. military to go in and help Border Patrol Agents round up every illegal crossing and return them back to Mexico. 

Mexico’s military assault on the U.S. has murdered U.S. Border Guards preventing drug trafficking. What does this say about Mexico’s attitude toward the United States: they hate Americans and have no respect for the U.S as a sovereign nation. And no one is stopping them.

The Mexican Military invasion is nothing new. It did not happen this week and suddenly find its way to my desk-top. Republican Presidential Candidate Tom Tancredo of Colorado has been battling the problem for years with no help from Washington. And he’s not the only American crying fowl while begging Washington to stop Mexico’s assault on the U.S. The Border Patrol also has been begging Washington to order up troops to the border to fight a war against Mexico.

In March of 2003, NewsMax’s Phil Brennan reported that 120 Mexican Military invasions had been documented. According to Brennan, thousands of armed Mexican soldiers helping smuggle drugs into the U.S. The invasions have been going on, noticed, for five years. According to Judicial Watch article “The Unauthorized Crossing of the U.S.—Mexican Border By Mexican Government Personnel,” the time of documenting Mexican Military invasions dates back to 1996.  That’s nearly 12 years of neglect by Capital Hill.

In 2006, Judicial Watch filed for the release of Homeland Security documents detailing 226 Mexican Military raids on the U.S. Nine years worth of military incursions on the U.S. were detailed in the records: maps, assaults on U.S. Border Patrol, Mexican helicopter raids, and Mexican boats smuggling drugs.

Soldier of Fortune Magazine noted Mexican HUMV’s stormed U.S. borders in 2000, firing on United States Border Patrol Police in Texas and California. Border Patrol Agents document and report the incursions, but are not taken seriously by the U.S. Government, who turns a blind eye, ignoring the military raids by Mexico.

There was a time in this nation’s history when an invader was blown out of the water or received a couple of bombs on a couple of their cities. The U.S. Government not only lets Mexicans enter the U.S. at free will while rewarding the gate-crashers with welfare from Washington and driver’s licenses from Elliot Spitzer, Washington has been allowing the Poncho Patrol to invade U.S. borders, gun down U.S. lawmen, and help drug traffickers proliferate drugs and prostitution throughout the nation.

Since the 1965 Hart-Cellar Bill and Ted Kennedy immigration policy for illegal immigrants, this nation has slowly been invaded by people who want nothing to do with American culture and everything to do with taking it from Americans in an effort to transform the U.S. into a dis-United States of Hispanica. The infiltration escalated in the 1990’s as Clinton ignored the serious threat, and then spiraled out of control as President Bush ignored Tom Tancredo’s warnings about U.S. borders being attacked by Mexico.

The only reason Washington chooses to disregard Mexico’s assaults on the United States is there are too many liberals running the government that used to be run by the people. It’s not as if Washington is completely ignorant of the onslaught; newspapers and magazines have been covering the subject for years, giving accurate accounts of every attack lawmen and conservative Legislators have been asking the government to help stop.

Another reason is Vicente Fox and his accusations to Larry King that he and President Bush had been working toward a U.S./Mexican dollar like the Euro. If that’s true, that would unite Mexico to the States. It would also cause chaos and economic ruination for the U.S. Yet it would explain why Every President since the 1965 Kennedy Immigration plan has ignored illegal immigration. It would explain why over the past 16 years illegal immigration numbers have risen to 20 million without deportation.

In 2005, Tom Tancredo told World Net Daily that President Bush needed to confront Mexico and “publicly denounce” the aggression against the U.S. by Mexico. This was after Vicente Fox announced he would sue James Gilchrist and the Minutemen Project if they dared arrest Mexican nationals. Fox threatened the U.S. would be hauled into The Hague for violations of Arizona Proposition 200.

In other words; Mexico has every right to send troops to the U.S. borders, assail U.S. lawmen, cross U.S. borders with drug traffickers, and kill U.S. Border Patrol doing the job Washington hired them to do—stop illegal invasions and attacks.

Making matters worse, the Mexican Army helps illegal aliens cross into U.S. borders by alerting illegals to the whereabouts of the Minutemen, and then directs illegals to areas where there aren’t patrol guards. And Washington has known this for years.

Remember the good old days when foreigners came to America legally by way of Ellis Island. Those who were illegal were sent back. The Europeans who stayed had the most incredible talents and skills—one of which was called honest hard work; the other was called “I don’t take charity.” Thus no welfare doled.

Some will argue illegals do in fact work hard. Yes; one worked extra hard last week setting California on fire. I will argue tax-payers work hard for a living before having to hand over the cloths on their backs every April 15^th to some slug wearing a rug who never pays taxes and never will.

In the meantime, the U.S. is stuck with invader’s children who receive paid-for-by-the-tax-payers educations, healthcare, and housing. The U.S. Military receives lousy pay and not so fabulous medical care and housing. Then again, the U.S. Military are vile terrorists invading poor little Iraq.

The U.S. Military never illegally invaded Iraq. The U.S. legally, justifiably, and congressionally approved, went into Iraq after ignored warnings to Saddam to step down and leave the country he terrorized. Mexico is actually illegally invading and firing upon the U.S. with the blessing from their government.

On October 18, 2007, MSNBC’s Joe Scarborough spoke with journalist Sarah Carter of the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin and T. J. Bonner of the National Border Patrol Council about Mexican incursions in the U.S. Carter reported the FBI concurred the Mexican Military aids drug smugglers and human traffickers, and Washington is aware of the problem.

Bonner told Scarborough the Mexican Military demands U.S. Border Agents to stop firing back at the Mexican raids. Bonner sent a letter to the white House, alerting the President of the seriousness of the situation. Bonner said the only reply was a letter thanking him for the information. He never received help. A few weeks later, one of his agents was “shot up” by the Mexican Military. 

Drug cartels are known to run the Mexican border towns, yet the State Department refuses to act on the threat of terrorism these towns present. Cartels are suspected of paying off the Mexican Military to help smuggle drugs and prostitutes into this nation, further infecting American youth and enslaving young women lured by the possibilities of a better life.

One has to wonder who else the Mexican Military is smuggling into the U.S.

Washington has two wars: one overseas it must stay in for the long haul, fighting to stop Islam from nuking the United States, and the other on the home front fighting Mexico. That is where the National Guard must be called into action.

Stealing American jobs and taxpayer dollars is bad enough; when that foreign military assaults American lawmen, it’s an invasion. If it’s not stopped, Americans will see the American culture and everything this nation was founded on disappear.

copyright 2007 Lisa Richards

www.lisa-richards.com

lisa-richards@lisa-richards.com

THE RESURRECTION OF NIKITA

BY LISA RICHARDS

OCTOBER 22, 2007

When Nikita Khrushchev gave his secret speech to the Twentieth Party Congress of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union on February 25, 1956, it sounded like a man who truly believed in freedom as he denounced Stalin. Khrushchev declared he wanted a “peaceful co-existence” with the United States and Europe.

Even an anonymous audience member didn’t buy it, asking Khrushchev why he never stopped Stalin.  Sound familiar yet? Keep reading; it will.

Reading the old speech I perceive very clever rhetoric. Words designed to make Khrushchev appear the man of the people as he praised the communist Lenin as some kind of folk hero who saved Russia from despair even though the truth is the opposite. Lenin may have been instrumental in ridding Russia from centuries of imperial Czar control, but he ushered in the reign of Soviet Communism, never giving the people the freedom and equality he promised. The manipulative constraints lasted until Gorbachev took control, introducing Glasnost to the people who took to the streets in revolution to communism.

Khrushchev never dissolved communism, nor was he any friend to the U.S.; maybe to Hollywood communists who adored him and “Uncle Joe,” but not to America. Khrushchev worked for Stalin; he did Stalin’s dirty work; he was Stalin’s second hand man turning a blind eye and never speaking up against Stalin’s atrocities, pointed out by that one audience member to the newly elected communist leader.

The truth is, Khrushchev was instrumental in helping Stalin massacre 100 million innocent souls in order to purge the Soviet Union of an unfit race after WWII—Jews.

Khrushchev was involved in those years of bloodshed and continued the Soviet Union of secrecy of lock-step government Stalin invented. No one was free under Khrushchev except those in the Kremlin who did his dirty work. No one in the Soviet Union was free to come and go until Gorbachev came in and gave the presses secret documents exposing the Kremlin’s corruption by pushing Glasnost openness.

Khrushchev was clever: he announced the era of Stalin’s “dictatorship of the proletariat” was over and “the state of the whole people” had begun. It never happened with Nikita. The Soviet Union grew more secretive and destructive toward the U.S. Is any of this ringing a bell? It should.

After Khrushchev gallantly spoke of peace, he turned like the communist he was, pushing the U.S. further into the Cold War: 1. Khrushchev promised economic aid to Afghanistan and Burma only if they swore allegiance and support to the Soviet Union, 2. in 1953, Khrushchev acquired the Hydrogen Bomb thanks to the traitorous American Rosenberg’s, 3. in 1955, The Warsaw pact of military alliance with communist countries against NATO was signed. These countries pledged to use nuclear power against NATO if war broke out, 4. 1957: the Space-Race began against the United States, 5. 1966: Khrushchev launched the Sputnik Satellite, 6. Khrushchev began a propaganda war against the United States and Great Britain.

Does any of this sound presently familiar? Does it echo a bit…oh I don’t know…Putin-esque?

“De-Stalinization” did not usher in capitalism. It did not bring about change for freedom. It didn’t even encompass European socialism—Gorbachev’s blind-sighted belief of a better Soviet Union. Under Khrushchev, communism simply advanced; any country endeavoring to create reform for freedom was brought under control by the Red Army Khrushchev sent in to quell any ideas by Soviets attempting to generate western democracy. Sounds like our pseudo-friend Putin.

Freedom finally came to the U.S.S.R. in 1991 when the Hammer and Sickle communist flag was lowered from atop the Kremlin and the Russian Flag was restored to its proper place. Soviet States broke up and all seemed well until Russian Prime Minister Vladimir Putin was asked to become acting president by President Boris Yeltsin.  In 2000, Putin won the election after the three month interval serving as acting president.

Putin won high approval ratings for his anti-terror platform and guarantee of economic growth. He held true to his promise and his approval ratings are still 70 to 80% high. But Putin, the man who brought Russia out of debt while cracking down on Chechen terrorists, pretended to be an American ally.

There’s an old saying: if it walks like a duck, quacks like a duck, it’s a duck. Putin is a former KGB agent whose job was overseeing communist East Germany. He kept East Germans in line, not letting them leave or speak freely and openly against the Kremlin until 1991 when communism ended.

It doesn’t take a rocket scientist to guess what the KGB did to those who spoke out. They’re not alive to tell anyone what they knew; or they’re too scared to talk. That says it all. Those who do speak out today get a special bowl of soup. Once a KGB Agent, always a KGB Agent.

He may not be a Joseph Stalin terrorist, but Vladimir Putin is no good guy/nice guy America and the west can trust. Putin is in bed with terrorists, defending the Adolf Hitler of today—Iran’s Mahmoud Ahmadinedjad.

That was not Putin’s soul President Bush saw when he looked into Putin’s eyes. Mephistopoles in a Khrushchev suit is more like it.

Putin came to the U.S. after 9/11 pretending to be an ally. The opposite is true: he is the enemy pushing the U.S. into another East/West showdown. Putin is the guy who declared he “longs for the glory days of old Mother Russia.” You mean like Vladimir Lenin and his Bolsheviks; or Czar Nicolas and his imperialism. Or perhaps you simply wish to “bury” us.

On October 16, 2006, Putin declared any attempt by the U.S. to strike Iran is unacceptable to him. According to Putin; “we [American’s] should not even think of making use of force in this [Iranian] region…not only should we [America] reject the use of force, but also the mention of force as a possibility.”

That sounds like a forceful threat from a low-life commie in a turtleneck.

Putin has threatened the U.S. for building defense shields in Europe. The U.S. is placing missile defense shields to protect Eastern Europe against possible Iranian strikes. Why should Putin be against the U.S. trying defending innocent people from Iran? Is it because Putin desires to take down the U.S. as the super power to place Russia in that position?

How very Nikita.

Again, you don’t have to be a rocket scientist to decipher the answer. Putin is a straightforward guy. He makes no bones about his contempt of all things American and his desire to make Russia number one in the world. He’s very upfront about defending Iran against the U.S.

Well, we have one honest communist since Khrushchev, who infamously declared he would “bury” the U.S. At least the true communists admit they hate us, wanting to destroy us, versus the closet commies like Hillary Clinton who pretends to be simple socialist wanting to join the E.U. while pretending she’ll give old people free medicine and $5,000 dollars cash from tax-payers to all the poor babies.

The October 16, 2007 issue of the New York Times made the meeting between Putin and Ahmadinedjad seem like a meeting between two Boy Scouts. Then again the Times love communists and terrorists and would love to see the two thugs take over the world. Then the Times would be the only American newspaper in existence.

Americans watching Putin speak out against us, reading his threats in papers and ignoring what the KGB/FSB communist is silently saying, considering him to be soon gone and the U.S. not threatened are wrong. President Putin is not going anywhere. He has already asked his Prime Minister to resign and take his place so Putin can go back to being Prime Minister of Russia. That keeps Putin in control and his plans to restore “the glory days of old mother Russia” easily accomplished.

Putin is Nikita Khrushchev resurrected.

Putin has taken control of the Russian government, placing it solely back in the Kremlin where he monitors everything. Putin has control of the Russian press, which can not speak freely without punishment. He has control of the Russian media and what they tell the people. Basically, Russian news is pro-Kremlin if one logs onto Russian newspapers. You have to go to the underground sites to get the truth; and how long they’ll last before shut-down occurs is up to Putin. Reporters who expose the Kremlin get a bullet in the head.

Don’t assume for one second Putin is not pushing the west into another Cold War. This is a man who dislikes capitalism and everything it stands for—unless it’s to line his pockets. If the U.S. has to go to war against Iran to stop a madman, Putin will not side with the U.S. He has made it clear he is on the side of terrorists and will defend Iran against the U.S. He doesn’t bother to hide the fact he’s helping Iran acquire nuclear bombs. If that happens, there will have to be war to stop a nuclear holocaust.

Those who think I’m disquieted over nothing ought to remember Nikita Khrushchev was considered an okay guy at first. But he was Stalin’s assassin; he tried to take down the U.S.; he bought stolen U.S. secrets; he threatened to “bury” us. Putin is no different. He was KBG/FSB; he is closing the Russian doors as he threatens the U.S. weekly with an attack if we dare take out the new Hitler on the rise.

copyright 2007 Lisa Richards

www.lisa-richards.com

E-mail: lisa-richards@lisa-richards.com

THE DEFINITION OF TORTURE:

TELLING TERRORISTS TO STOP BEING MEAN

BY LISA RICHARDS

October 16, 2007

“If you will not fight for the right when you can easily win without bloodshed; if you will not fight when your victory will be sure and not too costly; you may come to the moment when you will have to fight with all the odds against you and only a small chance of survival. There may even be a worse case: you may have to fight when there is no hope of victory, because it is better to perish than to live as slaves.”
Winston Churchill

My favorite moment in the movie Tombstone is when Kurt Russell’s character Wyatt Earp stands in the middle of the street, rifle waving in the air, shouting to the violent gang known as the Cowboys: “You called down the thunder, well now you’ve got it…you tell them hell’s coming and I’m coming with it!”

And Russell’s character Earp goes on a vengeful hunt, killing the Cowboys for the death of his brother and their terrorizing of Tombstone.

No matter how many times I watch the movie, that one scene with Russell standing in the street shouting those words makes me throw my fist in the air and whoop a big YES!

George W. Bush standing on the World Trade Center rubble pile after 9/11 was Wyatt Earp letting terrorist know he was coming and hell was coming with him. But liberals like Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi and Hillary Clinton don’t like Bush’s Wyatt ways. Bush believes in going after the terrorists and interrogating enemies is a must. To Nancy Pelosi who believes we should not harm the murderers of mankind, interrogation is unconscionable; to Hillary Clinton, it’s called “cow-boy diplomacy.”

On October 5, 2007, President Bush accomplished the impossible; he made comments to the press that actually caused Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi to raise her frozen-in-place forehead: “when we find somebody who may have information regarding a potential attack on America, you bet we’re going to detain them, and you bet we’re going to question them, because the American people expect us to find out information…so we can help protect them. That’s our job.”

Not according to Nancy who seems to be more concerned with the preserving the lives of Islamic murderers than actual human beings. You see, Nancy wants a definition of what Bush considers interrogation.

Well, locking the thugs of earth alone in a room with you Nancy would be considered torture in my book, and perfectly acceptable. They would all commit suicide. Better yet; why not arrest militant gays who invade Catholic Masses? Now that would be intolerantly torturous.

By the way, how could any form of torture be harmful to a race that desires suicide? Islam preaches and teaches death by suicide combined with murder to all non-Muslims. So why would torturing turbanites be so bad? After all, they do love to torture Jews and Christians. Maybe they would enjoy a little reciprocation.

Not in Nancy Pelosi’s book of Face Lifts and Fatwas.

On Sunday October 7, 2007, Fox News’s Chris Wallace interviewed the Speaker of the House on many issues, including Bush’s comments on interrogating the enemy. Bush’s interview two days earlier came as some sort of shock to the woman in charge of Congress.

Apparently, the “longest-serving member of Congress on the intelligence Committee” and ex Officio Leader does not get briefings on secret memos all other members of Congress receive. Pelosi claims she was never briefed in 2005 on any Department of Justice secret memos concerning interrogation. “All I know is what I’ve read in the New York Times.”

Dear fellow Americans, if you are wondering why the Democrat Congress and liberals in general are so screwed up, not doing one thing they claimed they would do since taking control of the House, it’s because the New York Times, not the President of the United States, has been hired to brief the Speaker of the House.

I wonder if that’s how Bill Clinton figured out he actually did have sex with that woman—reading it in the New York Times.

You know, Nancy Pelosi should ask the New York Times where Osama bin Laden is since the Times seems to be her only resource of intelligence and communication.

Oddly enough, on October 9, 2007, the House passed a bill for wiretapping the enemy, but Nancy is worried about interrogating those we find trying to kill us. It might not be kind treatment, and we wouldn’t want to be mean to the bad guys.

Pelosi told Wallace she “appreciates the value of intelligence to protect American people,” and admits she wants the best our CIA and military can get, but Nancy wants the president to understand America must follow “international standards” concerning interrogation. The U.S. must follow the law if the U.S. wants to appear good in the eyes of the world.

Having an excellent reputation is more important than the U.S. making the bad guys tell the CIA where and when the next attack is going to happen.

God forbid we insult the Russians.

So what exactly would Nancy consider torture? Well, according to what she told Wallace, torture would be “a combination of head-slapping, water-boarding, and exposure to extreme temperatures.” “There is a legal definition of torture,” Pelosi told Wallace, “that I believe this would fit,” further stating that the president has been reported in the press as saying the above are not torture, and “I just can’t give you an informative answer on that.”

Once again Nancy Pelosi claims to get her information from the press. Isn’t that what we the people do? Pelosi is the Speaker of the House of Congress and gets her information the way the people do? God help us; this woman is in charge.

To all you voters in California who reelected that woman to Congress, you deserve to be hit so hard in the heads you’re mother’s will feel the pain in their wombs.

Slapping terrorists in the head is not torture. Water-boarding is not torture. The person doesn’t drown; they only think they will. And exposure to extreme temperatures; oh please. I’m from New England. We have 100 degree humid summers instantly followed by chilly autumns, rapidly followed by freezing, damp, cold winters into rainy damp springs. If we new Englanders can handle those extremes, so can the mucks of martyrdom.

I’m so sick and tired of democrat leaders and their liberal ideals of treating all people equal. Terrorists are not equal to human beings. They don’t deserve fair treatment. Terrorist deserve the same as they give—death. If democrats get elected into the White House next year, Gitmo Bay will shut down and every terrorist in there will be set free to wreak havoc upon mankind. If Hillary or the anti-military Obama win the election, Nobel Peace Prizes will be handed out to every Muslim who succeeds in blowing up as many Jews and Christians as possible. If any of the democrat candidates win the election, say goodbye to wire-tapping the enemy and hello to another 9/11. If people allow a democrat to reenter the White House, expect Islam to infiltrate America further with greater freedom granted by liberals who love the enemy, want a socialized union with Mexico and Canada, and a Supreme Court answering to The Hague.

In my last piece I slammed Bush’s catering to Muslims and Ramadan when he should have denounced Islam and invited ex-Muslims to speak out on the evils this enemy is plotting against the world. I will always disagree with that bad move on Bush’s part. Yet despite my being against any Christian or Jew recognizing Muslims as equals and celebrating their holiday of fast and blast, I have to give Bush credit for keeping America safe from another attack. I may disagree with him on immigration and cow-towing to Islam, but he’s tough on terror and we’re safe because he let’s the CIA and military do their job—interrogate the enemy and get information to prevent another blood-bath.

I can’t discount the president on an excellent job fighting the War on Terror. I can discount Nancy Pelosi, because Pelosi is trying her best to block any and all means of extracting information which may prevent Americans from dying at the hands of mankind’s enemy. Pelosi knows better; she is a leader and her job is to protect the people of California and the halls of Congress, which must protect and create laws to protect the American people, not the enemy.

Nancy Pelosi and her fellow democrats—with the exception of the patriotic Joe Lieberman—are trying to reverse U.S. laws and override the Supreme Court to provide amnesty to massacring brutes. On top of that, the face-lifted diva of demoflop is trying to pass a genocide bill. Oh yes; that will definitely prevent another Hitler/Stalin/Saddam/Milosevic/Ahmadinedjad from ever murdering mankind. If Nancy says: no more genocide you naughty boys, evil will obey the Congressional Frisco queen.

Americans need to wise up and realize interrogation of the enemy is essential if we are to survive. Americans must do everything possible to fight Pelosi and legislators who want to protect the nihilistic Barbary’s resurrected and returned. Any Congressman or Senator who would vote down interrogation bills must be voted out of office. That includes Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi who gets all her vital, secret information via the New York Times.

On the up side, San Francisco’s militant gays can desecrate as many Catholic Masses as possible without arrest and interrogation.

copyright 2007 Lisa Richards

www.lisa-richards.com

E-mail: lisa-richards@lisa-richards.com

ATTENTION REVEREND KIRBY CALDWELL:

WOULD YOU PLEASE LAY HANDS ON GEORGE W. BUSH

BY LISA RICHARDS

October 11, 2007

THE OFFICIAL IDIOT OF THE WEEK:

PRESIDENT BUSH

Yes, Bush acted like an idiot this week. Why; he celebrated Ramadan by holding an official Iftaar dinner in honor of Ramadan at the White House.

Christians and Jews of America thank you Mr. President for hosting a dinner to honor the fasting month for terrorists.

Bush thanked the murderers of mankind for visiting the White House by claiming: “we celebrate traditions of Islamic faith, which brings hope and comfort to more than a billion people. For Muslims around the world, the holy month of Ramadan is a special time of prayer and fasting. It is a time for charity and service to those less fortunate. It’s a time to celebrate Islam’s learned and vibrant culture, which has enriched civilization for centuries.”

How nice; starve a little, and then go kill the infidel Jews and Christians.

George W. Bush is an Evangelical Born Again Christian. Like me, his faith is that of believing Jesus Christ—a Jew—is Almighty God and Jews are God’s chosen people because they are the true descendents of Abraham and King David—not the illegitimate ba****d of an Egyptian Ishmael. But Bush has been holding Ramadan celebrations for seven years, something no devout Christian would ever take part in since Allah is not God and Muslims follow and believe in a religion of murder.

Bush has broken that truth and belief by his taking part in a holiday for terrorists. Bush also made a claim that is absolutely false and in need of some serious hands-laying deliverance by the Reverend Kirby Caldwell—the guy who laid hands on Bush at his inauguration.

What did Bush do to get me fired up, shaking my head at him; he said this: “Ramadan is also a good time for Americans of all faiths to reflect on the values we hold in common—including love of family, gratitude to the Almighty, devotion to community, and a commitment to religious liberty.”

That’s not true. Christians and Jews do not worship the same god as Muslims. Muslims worship Allah, the pagan god of Muhammad’s pagan tribe. Muhammad needed a god for his new found-lying-on-a-cave-floor religion to get his tribe to follow him, so he told his tribe their fake pagan god Allah was Almighty God.  Those who refused to follow were beheaded by Muhammad.

What a vibrant culture of love!

Jesus never forced conversion. He said his sheep would hear his voice. He also told his apostles if people did not accept his teachings, just walk away. And Jesus never mentioned Allah being his father.

Nowhere in the Bible or Torah—the first five books of the Holy Bible—will anyone find Allah listed next to Jehovah, Yahweh, and all Hebrew names for Almighty God. That’s because Allah does not exist.

Also, Almighty God does not tell people to take up arms and kill off humanity if they don’t convert to Judaism. Yes, Jews went to war in Biblical times, but it was after they were brutally attacked by the violent destroyers of mankind the world is still fighting today. Now they are called Muslims, and they hate all non-Muslims—including Bush.

So no Mr. President, we do not worship the same god, nor do we have common values with Muslims. Muslims hate mankind and want every non-Muslim dead. Their Qur’an dictates this: “Smite the necks of the unbelievers” (Qur’an 47:4), “Those who reject Islam are the vilest of creatures” (Qur’an 98:6), “And slay them wherever ye find them, and drive them out of the places whence they drove you out, for persecution is worse than death” (Qur’an 2:191), “Allah hath purchased of the believers their persons and their goods; for theirs in return is the garden of paradise: they fight in his cause, and slay and are slain: a promise binding on him in truth” (Qur’an 9:111).

The above says to lop off the heads of non-Muslims; every non-Muslim is vile; slay every non-Muslim in existence; force them out of their countries by taking over; and kill all non-Muslims while committing suicide in order to get to heaven.

This is what president Bush celebrated when he celebrated Ramadan: death.

These so-called loving people of a so-called hijacked religion of so-called peace refuse to apologize for 9/11. Whenever Muslims are interviewed and confronted on the issue of their violent religion’s practice, they skirt the issue and say Islam teaches love and respect; Islam is about peace. Then Muslims try to turn the tables on Christians and Jews by saying the Bible is full of violence. Again; Jews never started those wars recorded in the Bible; the ancestors of today’s Muslims attacked Jews who had no choice but to fight back.

Atheists, Muslims and their liberal supporters will insist that’s not true. Of course, none of the three know how to read.

President Bush does know how to read; he does know exactly how evil Islam is and what it has done to mankind; Bush saw what that religion dictates when he visited the burning remains of the World Trade Center and Pentagon; Bush knows what the Qur’an states and yet he continues to cow-tow cater to Muslims. This is called being dangerously Politically Correct.

Mr. President, you don’t allow the murderers of mankind into the White House. The White House belongs to the citizens of the United States. That house is ours and those grim reaper gowned goons hate America. They will never chose America over Islam; they choose Islam above all—including their children they send off to homicide bomb Jews with exploding backpacks.

As a Christian, I’m taught to put Jesus Christ first, and in doing so, it teaches me I must put America first, never a religion or church. Bush is not doing that when he hosts a celebration in which Muslims fast for a month before going back to committing murder upon humanity.

Bush needs to stand up to these thugs of the world just as Prime Minister Howard of Australia did: Howard told all Muslims who do not put Australia first and become loyal Australians to get out of that nation. Bush needs to do the same to Muslims in America: America first or Islam; make a choice or get out.

What’s next Mr. President; offering Muslims 99% of the United States?

copyright 2007 Lisa Richards

www.lisa-richards.com

E-mail: lisa-richards@lisa-richards.com

DEMOCRATICALLY INSANE

BY LISA RICHARDS

October 7, 2007

Voting democrats into the White House would be akin unlocking the doors off padded cells in an insane asylum: you don’t let crazies loose to mingle amongst normal human beings.

September 26, 2007’s Dartmouth, New Hampshire Democrat Debate was absolute proof America can not afford to have lunatics named Clinton, Edwards, or Obama running the country. Each one wants to pull troops killing the murderers of humanity out of Iraq, only leaving a small number to guard the U.S. Embassy in Baghdad.

Oh, that will protect our homeland from Islamic loons plotting to come to the States to kill us all. Yes, let’s fight them on U.S. soil versus Iraqi soil. 9/11 was not explosive enough. Not enough people died to satisfy liberals. We need a really heavy bloodbath, like say, 30 million Americans dead for liberals to say: gee, ya think maybe staying in Iraq and fighting the freaks there is better than New York, Boston, Washington, L.A., San Francisco, Chicago, Phoenix, Miami, Atlanta, Dallas, Fort Worth, Minneapolis, Seattle, Newark, Detroit, and all the places in between?

Liberals are the very definition of insanity. Anyone who wants to stop killing evil where evil dwells and put America in the position of evil returning for another bombing is an insalubrious idiot.

In the words of the late great General George S. Patton: “Sure, we want to go home. We want this war over with. The quickest way to get it over with is to go get the bastards who started it. The quicker they are whipped, the quicker we can go home. The shortest way home is through Berlin and Tokyo. And when we get to Berlin, I am personally going to shoot that paper hanging son-of-a-b***h Hitler. Just like I'd shoot a snake!”

And that is exactly what we need to keep doing to the enemy—shoot them like the snakes they are. And do it on Iraqi soil, not U.S. soil.

But that’s not what Hillary, Obama and Edwards want. They want to pull troops out so fast; the enemy will fly to the States right behind the troops flying home. Why; because dems think war is wrong. Peace through strength is unfair to terrorists; fighting terrorists is intolerant. Not to mention liberal loons hate the military and America, so another 9/11 would make liberals happy.

The more destruction to America, the better.

Of course democrats are less interested in the War on Terror and more interested in taking Rush Limbaugh’s accurate account of Jessie Macbeth (that’s not his real name; he’s an Arab named Adam Al-Zaid) being a “phony soldier” out of context. I guess if a person pretends to have fought in the Gulf War and is caught lying about ever serving in the war, and someone has the guts to call the liar what he is—a phony—the Congress and Senate must hold floor debates on whether or not to ban Rush Limbaugh and run him out of town on a rail.

The next thing you know, democrat debates will be about whether or not Rush Limbaugh should be allowed to speak and live amongst the public. That’s how insane democrats are. They have nothing to talk about; no plan for the war or a successful pull-out, so they must attack the number one conservative commentary in America like school children fighting in a sandbox.

Can you imagine what Washington would look like under a Hillary White House? First of all, Bill would be the official First Whore with an office in the East Wing designated the Red-light Romper Room. Second, Hillary would go out of her way to find an old lesbian Jew for Vice President to grab the Jewish and lesbian votes.

John Edwards would simply purchase a three-way mirror as his V.P.

Let’s look at how Foreign Policy would be run: Jane Fonda would be elected Secretary of the State since she’s so good at dealing with foreign leaders—especially the enemy. Susan Sarandon would be appointed Secretary of Defense since she’s so brilliant when it comes to Military Science.

Next, George Soros would be Treasury Secretary since he’s so good at hijacking money for dems. Hugh Rodham would be appointed to the Federal Reserve since he’s a genius when it comes to handling money; Denise Rich would be put in charge of Lincoln Bedroom sales; Patricia Ireland would be appointed—without nomination—to the Supreme Court; Angela Davis would be appointed Attorney General, since, like Janet Reno, she has no respect for law enforcement or killing innocent people.

Forget finding a White House Press Secretary; Hillary will simply ask the First Whore to give the daily press reports since he’s a suck-up for lights, cameras and flashbulbs. Plus, he’s the darling of the liberal White House Press Corps who adored and kissed his feet for eight years in the Rose Garden.

As for the Department of Energy, well Hillary would simply appoint the only oilman liberals love: Hugo Chaves. Since Vicente Fox is out of a job, Hillary could appoint the Mexican head of the Department of Landscaping.  

I’m being funny, but I’m also being serious. Think about a Hillary White House and the kind of people she would have helping her control and rule the country.

And don’t think Obama, whose name rhymes with Osama, would be any better. Obama is only high on the candidate list because Oprah tells her dull-minded fans to vote for a man whose church is a black supremacist church. Boy, wouldn’t that be nice as president. Why not just elect David Duke?

And now Obama has removed his flag lapel pin. Why; oh that one is easy to answer: Obamba hates the flag, has no respect for the military and wants the anti-war crowd vote. What a good American.

If the insanocrats win, say goodbye to your freedoms people. Say goodbye to wiretapping Muslims planning to blow up America; say goodbye to Conservative Talk Radio, free speech to conservatives, Halloween, Thanksgiving, Christmas, Hanukkah and Easter displays, and all non-Muslim celebrations in public places for eight years, and hello to an Islamic/Ramadan/dishrag-wearing/forced Muslim prayer on Christian and Jewish kids in school, takeover by way of liberals. 

Under Democrats, Hajj-athons would replace the National Day of prayer. And if readers think 20 million illegals is bad, under democreeps America would become bilingual, allowing complete and full entrance to all Mexicans with no more border guards to stop them from invading.

And guns would be confiscated as democreeps dismantle the Second Amendment.

Democrats are insane—with the exception of Zell Miller and Joe Lieberman. Democrats want America to become a French colony of Spanish-speaking landscapers. If dems ever get their way, the U.S. would join the E.U. as a one world government. If you think that’s just hyperbole, look up Hillary and Ker